[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fd3e5862-3357-7dfc-6c75-30086ab19f82@nxp.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 17:33:39 +0300
From: Horia Geantă <horia.geanta@....com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"Van Leeuwen, Pascal" <pvanleeuwen@...bus.com>
Cc: "Andrei Botila (OSS)" <andrei.botila@....nxp.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org" <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-s390@...r.kernel.org" <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...s.com" <linux-arm-kernel@...s.com>,
Andrei Botila <andrei.botila@....com>,
Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 19/22] crypto: inside-secure - add check for xts input
length equal to zero
On 8/10/2020 4:45 PM, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 10:20:20AM +0000, Van Leeuwen, Pascal wrote:
>>
>> With all due respect, but this makes no sense.
>
> I agree. This is a lot of churn for no gain.
>
I would say the gain is that all skcipher algorithms would behave the same
when input length equals zero - i.e. treat the request as a no-op.
We can't say "no input" has any meaning to the other skcipher algorithms,
but the convention is to accept this case and just return 0.
I don't see why XTS has to be handled differently.
Thanks,
Horia
Powered by blists - more mailing lists