[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4c5fb964-6acb-6bb8-4eff-0bcb67d922f2@suse.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 06:39:44 +0200
From: Jürgen Groß <jgross@...e.com>
To: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Deep Shah <sdeep@...are.com>,
"VMware, Inc." <pv-drivers@...are.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/7] x86/paravirt: remove 32-bit support from
PARAVIRT_XXL
On 09.08.20 04:34, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 8/7/20 4:38 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> @@ -377,10 +373,7 @@ static inline pte_t __pte(pteval_t val)
>> {
>> pteval_t ret;
>>
>> - if (sizeof(pteval_t) > sizeof(long))
>> - ret = PVOP_CALLEE2(pteval_t, mmu.make_pte, val, (u64)val >> 32);
>> - else
>> - ret = PVOP_CALLEE1(pteval_t, mmu.make_pte, val);
>> + ret = PVOP_CALLEE1(pteval_t, mmu.make_pte, val);
>>
>> return (pte_t) { .pte = ret };
>
>
> Can this now simply return (pte_t) ret?
I don't think so, but I can turn it into
return native_make_pte(PVOP_CALLEE1(...));
Juergen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists