lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 14:03:55 +0800 From: Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com> To: chenzhou <chenzhou10@...wei.com> Cc: catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org, james.morse@....com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bhe@...hat.com, corbet@....net, John.P.donnelly@...cle.com, prabhakar.pkin@...il.com, bhsharma@...hat.com, horms@...ge.net.au, robh+dt@...nel.org, arnd@...db.de, nsaenzjulienne@...e.de, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, guohanjun@...wei.com, xiexiuqi@...wei.com, huawei.libin@...wei.com, wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 5/5] kdump: update Documentation about crashkernel Hi, > > Previously I remember we talked about to use similar logic as X86, but I > > remember you mentioned on some arm64 platform there could be no low > > memory at all. Is this not a problem now for the fallback? Just be > > curious, thanks for the update, for the common part looks good. > Hi Dave, > > Did you mean this discuss: https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/12/27/122? I meant about this reply instead :) https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/1/16/616 Thanks Dave
Powered by blists - more mailing lists