[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200810060355.GB6988@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 14:03:55 +0800
From: Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>
To: chenzhou <chenzhou10@...wei.com>
Cc: catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org, james.morse@....com,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bhe@...hat.com,
corbet@....net, John.P.donnelly@...cle.com,
prabhakar.pkin@...il.com, bhsharma@...hat.com, horms@...ge.net.au,
robh+dt@...nel.org, arnd@...db.de, nsaenzjulienne@...e.de,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
guohanjun@...wei.com, xiexiuqi@...wei.com, huawei.libin@...wei.com,
wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 5/5] kdump: update Documentation about crashkernel
Hi,
> > Previously I remember we talked about to use similar logic as X86, but I
> > remember you mentioned on some arm64 platform there could be no low
> > memory at all. Is this not a problem now for the fallback? Just be
> > curious, thanks for the update, for the common part looks good.
> Hi Dave,
>
> Did you mean this discuss: https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/12/27/122?
I meant about this reply instead :)
https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/1/16/616
Thanks
Dave
Powered by blists - more mailing lists