[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8c414dd7-4a80-6ff2-03de-5340fb0d9c61@wanadoo.fr>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 20:41:14 +0200
From: Marion & Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc: alexander.deucher@....com, christian.koenig@....com,
airlied@...ux.ie, daniel@...ll.ch, sumit.semwal@...aro.org,
colton.w.lewis@...tonmail.com, Ori.Messinger@....com,
m.szyprowski@...sung.com, bernard@...o.com,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: amdgpu: Use the correct size when allocating memory
Le 10/08/2020 à 17:42, Dan Carpenter a écrit :
> On Sun, Aug 09, 2020 at 10:34:06PM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
>> When '*sgt' is allocated, we must allocated 'sizeof(**sgt)' bytes instead
>> of 'sizeof(*sg)'. 'sg' (i.e. struct scatterlist) is smaller than
>> 'sgt' (i.e struct sg_table), so this could lead to memory corruption.
> The sizeof(*sg) is bigger than sizeof(**sgt) so this wastes memory but
> it won't lead to corruption.
>
> 11 struct scatterlist {
> 12 unsigned long page_link;
> 13 unsigned int offset;
> 14 unsigned int length;
> 15 dma_addr_t dma_address;
> 16 #ifdef CONFIG_NEED_SG_DMA_LENGTH
> 17 unsigned int dma_length;
> 18 #endif
> 19 };
>
> 42 struct sg_table {
> 43 struct scatterlist *sgl; /* the list */
> 44 unsigned int nents; /* number of mapped entries */
> 45 unsigned int orig_nents; /* original size of list */
> 46 };
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
My bad. I read 'struct scatterlist sgl' (without the *)
Thanks for the follow-up, Dan.
Doesn't smatch catch such mismatch?
(I've not run smatch for a while, so it is maybe reported)
Well, the proposal is still valid, even if it has less impact as
initially thought.
Thx for the review.
CJ
Powered by blists - more mailing lists