[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202008111427.D00FCCF@keescook>
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 14:33:13 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Allen <allen.lkml@...il.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Oscar Carter <oscar.carter@....com>,
Romain Perier <romain.perier@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, kgdb-bugreport@...ts.sourceforge.net,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Modernize tasklet callback API
On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 02:16:15PM +0530, Allen wrote:
> Here's the series re-based on top of 5.8
> https://github.com/allenpais/tasklets/tree/V3
Great!
> Let me know how you would want these to be reviewed.
Was a Coccinelle script used for any of these conversions? I wonder if
it'd be easier to do a single treewide patch for the more mechanical
changes.
And, actually, I still think the "prepare" patches should just be
collapsed into the actual "covert" patches -- there are only a few.
After those, yeah, I think getting these sent to their respective
maintainers is the next step.
> Also, I was thinking if removing tasklets completely could be a task
> on KSPP wiki. If yes, I did like to take ownership of that task. I have a
> couple of ideas in mind, which could be discussed in a separate email.
Sure! I will add it to the tracker. Here's for the refactoring:
https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/30
and here's for the removal:
https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/94
if you can added details/examples of how they should be removed, that'd
help other folks too, if they wanted to jump in. :)
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists