linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 07/10] remoteproc: imx_rproc: add i.MX specific parse fw hook

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200811215625.GC3370567@xps15>
Date:   Tue, 11 Aug 2020 15:56:25 -0600
From:   Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
To:     Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
Cc:     bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, o.rempel@...gutronix.de,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, shawnguo@...nel.org,
        s.hauer@...gutronix.de, kernel@...gutronix.de, festevam@...il.com,
        linux-imx@....com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] remoteproc: imx_rproc: add i.MX specific parse fw
 hook

On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 04:08:10PM +0800, Peng Fan wrote:
> The hook is used to parse memory-regions and load resource table
> from the address the remote processor published.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> ---
>  drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 99 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 98 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> index c23726091228..43000a992455 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
>  #include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
>  #include <linux/module.h>
>  #include <linux/of_address.h>
> +#include <linux/of_reserved_mem.h>
>  #include <linux/of_device.h>
>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>  #include <linux/regmap.h>
> @@ -89,6 +90,7 @@ struct imx_rproc {
>  	const struct imx_rproc_dcfg	*dcfg;
>  	struct imx_rproc_mem		mem[IMX7D_RPROC_MEM_MAX];
>  	struct clk			*clk;
> +	void				*rsc_va;

Where is this used?

>  };
>  
>  static const struct imx_rproc_att imx_rproc_att_imx7d[] = {
> @@ -251,6 +253,101 @@ static void *imx_rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, size_t len)
>  	return va;
>  }
>  
> +static int imx_rproc_mem_alloc(struct rproc *rproc,
> +			       struct rproc_mem_entry *mem)
> +{
> +	struct device *dev = rproc->dev.parent;
> +	void *va;
> +
> +	dev_dbg(dev, "map memory: %p+%zx\n", &mem->dma, mem->len);
> +	va = ioremap_wc(mem->dma, mem->len);
> +	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(va)) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "Unable to map memory region: %p+%zx\n",
> +			&mem->dma, mem->len);
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* Update memory entry va */
> +	mem->va = va;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int imx_rproc_mem_release(struct rproc *rproc,
> +				 struct rproc_mem_entry *mem)
> +{
> +	dev_dbg(rproc->dev.parent, "unmap memory: %pa\n", &mem->dma);
> +	iounmap(mem->va);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int imx_rproc_parse_memory_regions(struct rproc *rproc)
> +{
> +	struct imx_rproc *priv = rproc->priv;
> +	struct device_node *np = priv->dev->of_node;
> +	struct of_phandle_iterator it;
> +	struct rproc_mem_entry *mem;
> +	struct reserved_mem *rmem;
> +	int index = 0;
> +	u32 da;
> +
> +	/* Register associated reserved memory regions */
> +	of_phandle_iterator_init(&it, np, "memory-region", NULL, 0);
> +	while (of_phandle_iterator_next(&it) == 0) {
> +		rmem = of_reserved_mem_lookup(it.node);
> +		if (!rmem) {
> +			dev_err(priv->dev, "unable to acquire memory-region\n");
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +		}
> +
> +		/* No need to translate pa to da, i.MX use same map */
> +		da = rmem->base;
> +
> +		if (strcmp(it.node->name, "vdev0buffer")) {

Are you sure you will _always_ have a single vdev?  From the example you have
given to Oleksij it doesn't seem to be the case...

> +			/* Register memory region */
> +			mem = rproc_mem_entry_init(priv->dev, NULL,
> +						   (dma_addr_t)rmem->base,
> +						   rmem->size, da,
> +						   imx_rproc_mem_alloc,
> +						   imx_rproc_mem_release,
> +						   it.node->name);
> +
> +			if (mem)
> +				rproc_coredump_add_segment(rproc, da,
> +							   rmem->size);
> +		} else {
> +			/* Register reserved memory for vdev buffer alloc */
> +			mem = rproc_of_resm_mem_entry_init(priv->dev, index,
> +							   rmem->size,
> +							   rmem->base,
> +							   it.node->name);
> +		}
> +
> +		if (!mem)
> +			return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +		rproc_add_carveout(rproc, mem);
> +		index++;
> +	}
> +
> +	return  0;
> +}
> +
> +static int imx_rproc_parse_fw(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
> +{
> +	int ret = imx_rproc_parse_memory_regions(rproc);
> +
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	ret = rproc_elf_load_rsc_table(rproc, fw);
> +	if (ret)
> +		dev_info(&rproc->dev, "No resource table in elf\n");
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static int imx_rproc_elf_load_segments(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
>  {
>  	struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
> @@ -323,7 +420,7 @@ static const struct rproc_ops imx_rproc_ops = {
>  	.stop		= imx_rproc_stop,
>  	.da_to_va       = imx_rproc_da_to_va,
>  	.load		= imx_rproc_elf_load_segments,
> -	.parse_fw	= rproc_elf_load_rsc_table,
> +	.parse_fw	= imx_rproc_parse_fw,
>  	.find_loaded_rsc_table = rproc_elf_find_loaded_rsc_table,
>  	.sanity_check	= rproc_elf_sanity_check,
>  	.get_boot_addr	= rproc_elf_get_boot_addr,
> -- 
> 2.16.4
>