linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] sched, mm: Optimize current_gfp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3b353d6a-8430-b847-6ddd-21189c87ef6b@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue, 11 Aug 2020 19:32:52 -0400
From:   Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
        Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched, mm: Optimize current_gfp_context()

On 8/11/20 6:29 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Jun 2020 17:29:36 -0400 Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com> wrote:
>
>> The current_gfp_context() converts a number of PF_MEMALLOC_* per-process
>> flags into the corresponding GFP_* flags for memory allocation. In
>> that function, current->flags is accessed 3 times. That may lead to
>> duplicated access of the same memory location.
>>
>> This is not usually a problem with minimal debug config options on as the
>> compiler can optimize away the duplicated memory accesses.  With most
>> of the debug config options on, however, that may not be the case.
>> For example, the x86-64 object size of the __need_fs_reclaim() in a
>> debug kernel that calls current_gfp_context() was 309 bytes. With this
>> patch applied, the object size is reduced to 202 bytes. This is a saving
>> of 107 bytes and will probably be slightly faster too.
>>
>> ...
>>
>> --- a/include/linux/sched/mm.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/sched/mm.h
>> @@ -181,18 +181,20 @@ static inline bool in_vfork(struct task_struct *tsk)
>>    */
>>   static inline gfp_t current_gfp_context(gfp_t flags)
>>   {
>> -	if (unlikely(current->flags &
>> +	unsigned int pflags = READ_ONCE(current->flags);
> Why use READ_ONCE() here?

It was a change suggested by PeterZ. He said without the READ_ONCE(), 
the compiler may still choose to access current->flags multiple times 
instead of just reading it once. I think he is right and so I made the 
change.

Cheers,
Longman