[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM_iQpWsQubVJ-AYaLHujHwz68+nsHBcbgbf8XPMEPD=Vu+zaA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 20:57:19 -0700
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: Peilin Ye <yepeilin.cs@...il.com>
Cc: Wensong Zhang <wensong@...ux-vs.org>,
Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...filter.org>,
Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
lvs-devel@...r.kernel.org,
NetFilter <netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
coreteam@...filter.org,
linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
syzkaller-bugs <syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH net] ipvs: Fix uninit-value in do_ip_vs_set_ctl()
On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 3:10 PM Peilin Ye <yepeilin.cs@...il.com> wrote:
>
> do_ip_vs_set_ctl() is referencing uninitialized stack value when `len` is
> zero. Fix it.
Which exact 'cmd' is it here?
I _guess_ it is one of those uninitialized in set_arglen[], which is 0.
But if that is the case, should it be initialized to
sizeof(struct ip_vs_service_user) instead because ip_vs_copy_usvc_compat()
is called anyway. Or, maybe we should just ban len==0 case.
In either case, it does not look like you fix it correctly.
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists