[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2ffb90c5-5803-658d-27b0-968b5e9bd3c5@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 09:20:10 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>, Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta.linux@...il.com>,
Qian Cai <cai@....pw>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] mm / virtio-mem: support ZONE_MOVABLE
On 11.08.20 04:21, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Aug 2020 09:56:32 +0200 David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com> wrote:
>
>> On 04.08.20 21:41, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>> @Andrew can we give this a churn and consider it for v5.9 in case there
>>> are no more comments?
>>
>> @Andrew, Ping, so I assume we'll target v5.10?
>
> Yep, sorry. Merging a significant patch series during the merge
> window(!) would be quite extraordinary and I don't think that anything
> in this patchset justifies such an action?
>
Okay, now I know you are aware of this series :)
First, I thought #1 would be worth for v5.9, but it looks like it's not
actually necessary. I'll respin the whole series for v5.10.
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists