| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 07:44:51 +0000
From: Damien Le Moal <Damien.LeMoal@....com>
To: 邱文博 <qiuwenbo@...tium.com.cn>
CC: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
"linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Atish Patra <Atish.Patra@....com>,
Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Zong Li <zong.li@...ive.com>,
Greentime Hu <greentime.hu@...ive.com>,
Vincent Chen <vincent.chen@...ive.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv: Setup exception vector for K210 properly
On 2020/08/11 16:06, 邱文博 wrote:
> The serial port did not print anything after early console.
>
> [ 0.000000] Sorting __ex_table...
> [ 0.000000] mem auto-init: stack:off, heap alloc:off, heap free:off
> [ 0.000000] Memory: 6480K/8192K available (1024K kernel code, 111K rwdata, 170K rodata, 101K init, 97K bss, 1712K reserved, 0K cma-reserved)
> [ 0.000000] rcu: Hierarchical RCU implementation.
> [ 0.000000] rcu: RCU calculated value of scheduler-enlistment delay is 25 jiffies.
> [ 0.000000] NR_IRQS: 64, nr_irqs: 64, preallocated irqs: 0
> [ 0.000000] riscv-intc: 64 local interrupts mapped
> [ 0.000000] plic: interrupt-controller@...0000: mapped 65 interrupts with 2 handlers for 4 contexts.
> [ 0.000000] random: get_random_bytes called from 0x00000000800019a4 with crng_init=0
> [ 0.000000] riscv_timer_init_dt: Registering clocksource cpuid [0] hartid [0]
> [ 0.000000] clocksource: riscv_clocksource: mask: 0xffffffffffffffff max_cycles: 0x3990be68b, max_idle_ns: 881590404272 ns
> [ 0.000015] sched_clock: 64 bits at 7MHz, resolution 128ns, wraps every 4398046511054ns
> [ 0.008254] Console: colour dummy device 80x25
Interesting. Never saw that happening... Thanks !
>
>
>
> > -----原始邮件-----
> > 发件人: "Damien Le Moal" <damien.lemoal@....com>
> > 发送时间: 2020-08-11 14:42:15 (星期二)
> > 收件人: "Qiu Wenbo" <qiuwenbo@...tium.com.cn>, "Palmer Dabbelt" <palmer@...belt.com>, "Paul Walmsley" <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, "linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>
> > 抄送: "Albert Ou" <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, "Atish Patra" <atish.patra@....com>, "Anup
> > Patel" <anup@...infault.org>, "Guo Ren" <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>, "Zong Li" <zong.li@...ive.com>, "Greentime Hu" <greentime.hu@...ive.com>, "Vincent Chen" <vincent.chen@...ive.com>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
> > 主题: Re: [PATCH] riscv: Setup exception vector for K210 properly
> >
> > On 2020/08/11 15:38, Qiu Wenbo wrote:
> > > Exception vector is missing on nommu platform and it is a big issue.
> > > This patch is tested in Sipeed MAIX Bit Dev Board.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 79b1feba5455 ("RISC-V: Setup exception vector early")
> > > Signed-off-by: Qiu Wenbo <qiuwenbo@...tium.com.cn>
> > > ---
> > > arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c | 1 +
> > > arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c | 11 ++++++++++-
> > > 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c
> > > index 356825a57551..23cde0ceb39d 100644
> > > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c
> > > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c
> > > @@ -154,6 +154,7 @@ asmlinkage __visible void smp_callin(void)
> > > mmgrab(mm);
> > > current->active_mm = mm;
> > >
> > > + trap_init();
> > > notify_cpu_starting(curr_cpuid);
> > > update_siblings_masks(curr_cpuid);
> > > set_cpu_online(curr_cpuid, 1);
> > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c
> > > index ad14f4466d92..a390239818ae 100644
> > > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c
> > > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c
> > > @@ -174,7 +174,16 @@ int is_valid_bugaddr(unsigned long pc)
> > > }
> > > #endif /* CONFIG_GENERIC_BUG */
> > >
> > > -/* stvec & scratch is already set from head.S */
> > > +/* stvec & scratch is already set from head.S when mmu is enabled */
> > > void trap_init(void)
> > > {
> > > +#ifndef CONFIG_MMU
> > > + /*
> > > + * Set sup0 scratch register to 0, indicating to exception vector
> > > + * that we are presently executing in the kernel
> > > + */
> > > + csr_write(CSR_SCRATCH, 0);
> > > + /* Set the exception vector address */
> > > + csr_write(CSR_TVEC, &handle_exception);
> > > +#endif
> > > }
> > >
> >
> > Looks OK to me. But out of curiosity, how did you trigger a problem ? I never
> > got any weird exceptions with my busybox userspace.
> >
> > --
> > Damien Le Moal
> > Western Digital Research
> </qiuwenbo@...tium.com.cn></linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org></vincent.chen@...ive.com></greentime.hu@...ive.com></zong.li@...ive.com></guoren@...ux.alibaba.com></anup@...infault.org></atish.patra@....com></aou@...s.berkeley.edu></linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org></paul.walmsley@...ive.com></palmer@...belt.com></qiuwenbo@...tium.com.cn></damien.lemoal@....com>
>
>
>
>
>
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
Powered by blists - more mailing lists