[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200811075924.GU3982@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 09:59:24 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: "Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, oleg@...hat.com, acme@...nel.org,
jolsa@...nel.org, Linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ak@...ux.intel.com,
kan.liang@...el.com, yao.jin@...el.com,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, mark.rutland@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] perf/core: Fake regs for leaked kernel samples
On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 03:50:43PM +0800, Jin, Yao wrote:
> Could I post v2 which basically refers to your patch but removes some
> conditions since I see some issues in test if we use these conditions.
>
> 1. Remove '!event->attr.exclude_hv || !event->attr.exclude_host ||
> !event->attr.exclude_guest' at the entry of sanitize_sample_regs().
>
> 2. Remove '!attr.exclude_hv || !attr.exclude_host || !attr.exclude_guest'
> at the perf_event_open syscall entry.
exclude_host, maybe -- due to the dodgy semantics of it, but the others
should definitely be there.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists