linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/paravirt: Add missing noinstr to arch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200811081205.GV3982@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Tue, 11 Aug 2020 10:12:05 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Jürgen Groß <jgross@...e.com>
Cc:     Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        fenghua.yu@...el.com, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        syzkaller-bugs <syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
        yu-cheng.yu@...el.com, sdeep@...are.com,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        kasan-dev <kasan-dev@...glegroups.com>,
        syzbot <syzbot+8db9e1ecde74e590a657@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/paravirt: Add missing noinstr to arch_local*()
 helpers

On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 09:57:55AM +0200, Jürgen Groß wrote:
> On 11.08.20 09:41, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 05:19:03PM +0200, Marco Elver wrote:
> > 
> > > My hypothesis here is simply that kvm_wait() may be called in a place
> > > where we get the same case I mentioned to Peter,
> > > 
> > > 	raw_local_irq_save(); /* or other IRQs off without tracing */
> > > 	...
> > > 	kvm_wait() /* IRQ state tracing gets confused */
> > > 	...
> > > 	raw_local_irq_restore();
> > > 
> > > and therefore, using raw variants in kvm_wait() works. It's also safe
> > > because it doesn't call any other libraries that would result in corrupt
> > 
> > Yes, this is definitely an issue.
> > 
> > Tracing, we also musn't call into tracing when using raw_local_irq_*().
> > Because then we re-intoduce this same issue all over again.
> > 
> > Both halt() and safe_halt() are more paravirt calls, but given we're in
> > a KVM paravirt call already, I suppose we can directly use native_*()
> > here.
> > 
> > Something like so then... I suppose, but then the Xen variants need TLC
> > too.
> 
> Just to be sure I understand you correct:
> 
> You mean that xen_qlock_kick() and xen_qlock_wait() and all functions
> called by those should gain the "notrace" attribute, right?
> 
> I am not sure why the kick variants need it, though. IMO those are
> called only after the lock has been released, so they should be fine
> without notrace.

The issue happens when someone uses arch_spinlock_t under
raw_local_irq_*().

> And again: we shouldn't forget the Hyper-V variants.

Bah, my grep failed :/ Also *groan*, that's calling apic->send_IPI().