lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200811110154.GY3510@suse.de>
Date:   Tue, 11 Aug 2020 12:01:54 +0100
From:   Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
To:     ????????? <tianchen.dingtianc@...baba-inc.com>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        ?????? <yun.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] sched/numa: fix bug in update_task_scan_period

On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 04:30:31PM +0800, ????????? wrote:
> When p->numa_faults_locality[2] > 0, numa_scan_period is doubled, but
> this array will never be cleared, which causes scanning period always
> reaching its max value. This patch clears numa_faults_locality after
> numa_scan_period being doubled to fix this bug.
> 

An out label at the end of the function to clears numa_faults_locality
would also work with a comment explaining why.  That aside, what is
the user-visible impact of the patch? If there are no useful faults or
migration failures, it makes sense that scanning is very slow until the
situation changes. The corner case is that a migration failure might keep
the scan rate slower than it should be but the flip side is that fixing
it might increase the scan rate and still incur migration failures which
introduces overhead with no gain.

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ