linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm/slub: Introduce two counters for the partial objects

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2008111250170.86069@www.lameter.com>
Date:   Tue, 11 Aug 2020 12:52:35 +0000 (UTC)
From:   Christopher Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To:     Pekka Enberg <penberg@...il.com>
cc:     Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        Xunlei Pang <xlpang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Wen Yang <wenyang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        Yang Shi <yang.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>,
        "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm/slub: Introduce two counters for the partial
 objects

On Fri, 7 Aug 2020, Pekka Enberg wrote:

> Why do you consider this to be a fast path? This is all partial list
> accounting when we allocate/deallocate a slab, no? Just like
> ___slab_alloc() says, I assumed this to be the slow path... What am I
> missing?

I thought these were per object counters? If you just want to count the
number of slabs then you do not need the lock at all. We already have a
counter for the number of slabs.

> No objections to alternative fixes, of course, but wrapping the
> counters under CONFIG_DEBUG seems like just hiding the actual issue...

CONFIG_DEBUG is on by default. It just compiles in the debug code and
disables it so we can enable it with a kernel boot option. This is because
we have had numerous issues in the past with "production" kernels that
could not be recompiled with debug options. So just running the prod
kernel with another option will allow you to find hard to debug issues in
a full scale producton deployment with potentially proprietary modules
etc.