lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 11 Aug 2020 20:49:02 +0200
From:   Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To:     Stephen Berman <stephen.berman@....net>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
        Robert Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
        Erik Kaneda <erik.kaneda@...el.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:ACPI COMPONENT ARCHITECTURE (ACPICA)" <devel@...ica.org>
Subject: Re: power-off delay/hang due to commit 6d25be57 (mainline)

On 2020-08-11 19:22:19 [+0200], Stephen Berman wrote:
> Attached.

ssdt6.dsl:
|  ThermalZone (TZ10)
|  {
…
|      Method (_TSP, 0, Serialized)  // _TSP: Thermal Sampling Period
|      {
|          Return (0x0A)
|      }
|
|      Method (_TZP, 0, Serialized)  // _TZP: Thermal Zone Polling
|      {
|          Return (0x0A)
|      }
|
|      Method (_TMP, 0, Serialized)  // _TMP: Temperature
|      {
|          \GSA1.ZRC3 ()
|          Sleep (0x03E8)
|          Notify (\_TZ.TZ10, 0x81) // Thermal Trip Point Change
|          Return (0x0B54)
|      }

So if I read this correctly then TZ10 should be polled every second
(check) and the temperature function contains a `sleep(1 second)' (which
explains the mysteries delay) followed by the Notify() (which schedules
the worker).

Now I'm curious if Windows has the same ACPI tables and if so how they
behave here. And what the actual plan here was. And where is the border
when one is actual allowed to make fun of someone. So many questions. 

> Done as Bug 208877.

Thank you.

> Steve Berman

Sebastian

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ