[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a009f2e5-8bf9-fc7d-ece6-0ee2e4381cc1@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 21:21:49 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-acpi <linux-acpi@...el.com>, rafael@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] genirq/PM: Always unlock IRQ descriptor in rearm_wake_irq
On 8/11/2020 8:00 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> rearm_wake_irq() does not unlock the irq descriptor if the interrupt
> is not suspended or if wakeup is not enabled on it. Fix it.
>
> Fixes: 3a79bc63d9075 ("PCI: irq: Introduce rearm_wake_irq()")
> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
And it needs to go to -stable (even though the bug is latent now,
because this function is called for suspended IRQs only AFAICS).
Or I can apply this as the mistake was in my commit. Please let me know
what you prefer.
> ---
> kernel/irq/pm.c | 8 ++++++--
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/pm.c b/kernel/irq/pm.c
> index 8f557fa1f4fe..c6c7e187ae74 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/pm.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/pm.c
> @@ -185,14 +185,18 @@ void rearm_wake_irq(unsigned int irq)
> unsigned long flags;
> struct irq_desc *desc = irq_get_desc_buslock(irq, &flags, IRQ_GET_DESC_CHECK_GLOBAL);
>
> - if (!desc || !(desc->istate & IRQS_SUSPENDED) ||
> - !irqd_is_wakeup_set(&desc->irq_data))
> + if (!desc)
> return;
>
> + if (!(desc->istate & IRQS_SUSPENDED) ||
> + !irqd_is_wakeup_set(&desc->irq_data))
> + goto unlock;
> +
> desc->istate &= ~IRQS_SUSPENDED;
> irqd_set(&desc->irq_data, IRQD_WAKEUP_ARMED);
> __enable_irq(desc);
>
> +unlock:
> irq_put_desc_busunlock(desc, flags);
> }
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists