lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 12 Aug 2020 11:59:04 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:     Peilin Ye <yepeilin.cs@...il.com>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
        syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH] hfs, hfsplus: Fix NULL pointer
 dereference in hfs_find_init()

Yeah, the patch doesn't work at all.  I looked at one call tree and it
is:

hfs_mdb_get() tries to allocate HFS_SB(sb)->ext_tree.

	HFS_SB(sb)->ext_tree = hfs_btree_open(sb, HFS_EXT_CNID, hfs_ext_keycmp);
                    ^^^^^^^^

hfs_btree_open() calls page = read_mapping_page(mapping, 0, NULL);
read_mapping_page() calls mapping->a_ops->readpage() which leads to
hfs_readpage() which leads to hfs_ext_read_extent() which calls
res = hfs_find_init(HFS_SB(inode->i_sb)->ext_tree, &fd);
                                         ^^^^^^^^

So we need ->ext_tree to be non-NULL before we can set ->ext_tree to be
non-NULL...  :/

I wonder how long this has been broken and if we should just delete the
AFS file system.

regards,
dan carpenter

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ