[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200812105053.602-1-zhantao.tang@windriver.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 18:50:53 +0800
From: <zhantao.tang@...driver.com>
To: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <bigeasy@...utronix.de>, <tglx@...utronix.de>,
<rostedt@...dmis.org>, <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH linux-5.2.y-rt only] hrtimer: correct the logic for grab expiry lock
From: Zhantao Tang <zhantao.tang@...driver.com>
In commit: 47b6de0b7f22 ("hrtimer: Add a missing bracket and hide `migration_base' on !SMP")
a inline function is_migration_base() is introduced. But
the logic of the hrtimer_grab_expiry_lock was changed.
This patch is to correct it.
Signed-off-by: Zhantao Tang <zhantao.tang@...driver.com>
---
kernel/time/hrtimer.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
index b3adac366fd1..6b47e310c68e 100644
--- a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
+++ b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c
@@ -944,7 +944,7 @@ void hrtimer_grab_expiry_lock(const struct hrtimer *timer)
{
struct hrtimer_clock_base *base = READ_ONCE(timer->base);
- if (timer->is_soft && is_migration_base(base)) {
+ if (timer->is_soft && !is_migration_base(base)) {
spin_lock(&base->cpu_base->softirq_expiry_lock);
spin_unlock(&base->cpu_base->softirq_expiry_lock);
}
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists