lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 12 Aug 2020 09:12:56 -0700
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
Cc:     linuxarm@...wei.com, mauro.chehab@...wei.com,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devel@...verdev.osuosl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 20/44] staging: mfd: hi6421-spmi-pmic: fix some coding
 style issues

On Wed, 2020-08-12 at 17:56 +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Checkpatch complains about some minor issues inside this
> driver that were not addressed by the previous patch.
> 
> Address them.
[]
> diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/hi6421-spmi-pmic.h b/include/linux/mfd/hi6421-spmi-pmic.h
[]
> @@ -38,7 +38,8 @@ struct hi6421_spmi_pmic {
>  	unsigned int				*irqs;
>  	int					irqnum;
>  	int					irqarray;
> -	struct hi6421_spmi_irq_mask_info 	irq_mask_addr;
> +
> +	struct hi6421_spmi_irq_mask_info	irq_mask_addr;
>  	struct hi6421_spmi_irq_info		irq_addr;
>  };

Was adding a blank line one of checkpatch complaints?
I doubt it. 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists