[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <779c290b-45f5-b86c-c573-2edb4004105d@tycho.nsa.gov>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 15:16:42 -0400
From: Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>
To: Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
"Serge E . Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Vincent Dagonneau <vincent.dagonneau@....gouv.fr>,
kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v20 05/12] LSM: Infrastructure management of the
superblock
On 8/2/20 5:58 PM, Mickaël Salaün wrote:
> From: Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
>
> Move management of the superblock->sb_security blob out
> of the individual security modules and into the security
> infrastructure. Instead of allocating the blobs from within
> the modules the modules tell the infrastructure how much
> space is required, and the space is allocated there.
>
> Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> Reviewed-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>
> Reviewed-by: Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>
> Reviewed-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190829232935.7099-2-casey@schaufler-ca.com
> ---
>
> Changes since v17:
> * Rebase the original LSM stacking patch from v5.3 to v5.7: I fixed some
> diff conflicts caused by code moves and function renames in
> selinux/include/objsec.h and selinux/hooks.c . I checked that it
> builds but I didn't test the changes for SELinux nor SMACK.
You shouldn't retain Signed-off-by and Reviewed-by lines from an earlier
patch if you made non-trivial changes to it (even more so if you didn't
test them).
Powered by blists - more mailing lists