[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMpxmJXzaA7M94D7O5RB1WMVPz5dK61aVO_SOsu-TGTLtBZU6Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 21:33:59 +0200
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Cc: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@....fi>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, Bingbu Cao <bingbu.cao@...el.com>,
linux-media <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
Chiranjeevi Rapolu <chiranjeevi.rapolu@...el.com>,
Hyungwoo Yang <hyungwoo.yang@...el.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Rajmohan Mani <rajmohan.mani@...el.com>,
Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/6] at24: Support probing while off
On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 9:25 PM Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de> wrote:
>
>
> > Wolfram says. From my side: I'd prefer to see the
> > disable_i2c_core_irq_mapping converted to flags first and then the
> > flags extended with whatever you need. disable_i2c_core_irq_mapping
> > could also be removed AFAICT - nobody uses it.
>
> I haven't read the details here, just saying that
> 'disable_i2c_core_irq_mapping' is already removed in -next and also
> within the next days in Linus' tree.
>
Ok, then nevermind my previous comment.
Bart
Powered by blists - more mailing lists