[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGRrVHwCYRXixfft1FCnwU-1UzuoUF3iVayRjD8G_QXX2+nOcQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 13:53:12 -0600
From: Ross Zwisler <zwisler@...omium.org>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mattias Nissler <mnissler@...omium.org>,
Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@...har.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Benjamin Gordon <bmgordon@...gle.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...gle.com>,
Jesse Barnes <jsbarnes@...gle.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Micah Morton <mortonm@...gle.com>,
Raul Rangel <rrangel@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7] Add a "nosymfollow" mount option.
On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 12:36 PM Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 04:28:03PM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/mount.h b/include/uapi/linux/mount.h
> > index 96a0240f23fed..dd8306ea336c1 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/mount.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/mount.h
> > @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
> > #define MS_REMOUNT 32 /* Alter flags of a mounted FS */
> > #define MS_MANDLOCK 64 /* Allow mandatory locks on an FS */
> > #define MS_DIRSYNC 128 /* Directory modifications are synchronous */
> > +#define MS_NOSYMFOLLOW 256 /* Do not follow symlinks */
> > #define MS_NOATIME 1024 /* Do not update access times. */
> > #define MS_NODIRATIME 2048 /* Do not update directory access times */
> > #define MS_BIND 4096
>
> Does this need to be added to MS_RMT_MASK too?
I don't think so, because IIUC that is only for "superblock flags",
i.e. flags which are part of the sb_flags definition in
do_mount()/path_mount()?
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/fs/namespace.c#L3172
With the current code I'm able to remount and flip nosymfollow both
directions without issue. Similarly, MS_NOEXEC can be turned on and
off at will, and it's not part of MS_RMT_MASK nor sb_flags.
Interestingly, though, if you change MS_RMT_MASK to be 0, I would
expect us to be unable to twiddle all the flags which are currently
part of it, but that isn't the case. I was still able to change
between RO/RW, and turn on lazytime.
So, I think this flag is working as expected, but that there is
probably a bug in there somewhere WRT the handling of MS_RMT_MASK.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists