[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKwvOdm3VTZ2QXXxf9pjM6n87UE=Lc-9Cx=V70sNsYGmHCb-hA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 15:52:54 -0700
From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
To: Nathan Huckleberry <nhuck@...gle.com>
Cc: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
Tom Roeder <tmroeder@...gle.com>,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] kbuild: clang-tidy
On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 12:56 PM Nathan Huckleberry <nhuck@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 12:40 PM Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> > I improved gen_compile_commands.py in the first two patches,
> > then rebased Nathan's v7 [1] on top of them.
> > To save time, I modified the Makefile part.
> > No change for run-clang-tools.py
> >
> > I am not sure if the new directory, scripts/clang-tools/,
> > is worth creating only for 2 files, but I do not have
> > a strong opinion about it.
> >
> > "make clang-tidy" should work in-tree build,
> > out-of-tree build (O=), and external module build (M=).
> > Tests and reviews are appreciated.
> >
> > "make clang-tidy" worked for me.
> >
> > masahiro@...ar:~/workspace/linux-kbuild$ make -j24 CC=clang clang-tidy
> > DESCEND objtool
> > CALL scripts/atomic/check-atomics.sh
> > CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh
> > CHK include/generated/compile.h
> > GEN compile_commands.json
> > CHECK compile_commands.json
> >
> > But "make clang-analyzer" just sprinkled the following error:
> >
> > Error: no checks enabled.
> > USAGE: clang-tidy [options] <source0> [... <sourceN>]
I wasn't able to reproduce Masahiro's reported failure, but seeing as
he has `GEN` for compile_commands.json and I have `CHK`, I wonder if
that's from a run when the series was still under development?
I can reproduce if I run:
$ clang-tidy '-checks='
so maybe was string quoting problem?
> >
> > I built clang-tidy from the latest source.
> > I had no idea how to make it work...
>
> How are you building clang-tidy? The clang static-analyzer may not
> have been built.
> I believe the static analyzer is built as a part of clang, not as a
> part of clang-tools-extra.
>
> I use this command to build.
> cmake -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE="release"
> -DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD="X86;AArch64;ARM;RISCV"
> -DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS="clang;clang-tools-extra;lld;llvm-as"
> -DLLVM_ENABLE_LLD=1 -G "Ninja" ../llvm
>
> Adding clang to the list of -DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS will build the
> static analyzer.
> -DCLANG_ENABLE_STATIC_ANALYZER=1 might also work, but I haven't tested it.
>
> I tested the patchset and both clang-tidy and clang-analyzer work for me.
If you rename clang-tidy in your build dir, and ensure you don't have
a `clang-tidy` in your $PATH (`which clang-tidy`), maybe there's more
we can do to politely inform the user they're missing a dependency to
execute the make target? Not sure if we could could test that
clang-tidy supports the clang-analyzer-* checks. Isn't there an
invocation that prints the supported checks? `clang-tidy '-checks=*'
--list-checks` is in my shell history. Maybe grepping that and
informing the user how to fix the problem might solve a "papercut?"
If I remove clang-tidy with this series applied, I get (the failure is
obvious to me, but...):
```
$ make LLVM=1 -j71 clang-tidy
...
multiprocessing.pool.RemoteTraceback:
"""
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python3.8/multiprocessing/pool.py", line 125, in worker
result = (True, func(*args, **kwds))
File "/usr/lib/python3.8/multiprocessing/pool.py", line 48, in mapstar
return list(map(*args))
File "./scripts/clang-tools/run-clang-tools.py", line 54, in run_analysis
p = subprocess.run(["clang-tidy", "-p", args.path, checks, entry["file"]],
File "/usr/lib/python3.8/subprocess.py", line 489, in run
with Popen(*popenargs, **kwargs) as process:
File "/usr/lib/python3.8/subprocess.py", line 854, in __init__
self._execute_child(args, executable, preexec_fn, close_fds,
File "/usr/lib/python3.8/subprocess.py", line 1702, in _execute_child
raise child_exception_type(errno_num, err_msg, err_filename)
FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'clang-tidy'
"""
The above exception was the direct cause of the following exception:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "./scripts/clang-tools/run-clang-tools.py", line 74, in <module>
main()
File "./scripts/clang-tools/run-clang-tools.py", line 70, in main
pool.map(run_analysis, datastore)
File "/usr/lib/python3.8/multiprocessing/pool.py", line 364, in map
return self._map_async(func, iterable, mapstar, chunksize).get()
File "/usr/lib/python3.8/multiprocessing/pool.py", line 771, in get
raise self._value
FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'clang-tidy'
make: *** [Makefile:1861: clang-tidy] Error 1
```
$ clang-tidy '-checks=*' --list-checks | grep clang-analyzer | wc -l
111
And I'm not sure you can even build clang or clang-tidy but not the analyzer.
>
> >
> > [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11687833/
> >
> >
> >
> > Masahiro Yamada (2):
> > gen_compile_commands: parse only the first line of .*.cmd files
> > gen_compile_commands: wire up build rule to Makefile
> >
> > Nathan Huckleberry (1):
> > Makefile: Add clang-tidy and static analyzer support to makefile
> >
> > MAINTAINERS | 1 +
> > Makefile | 45 +++++-
> > scripts/clang-tools/gen_compile_commands.py | 117 +++++++++++++++
> > scripts/clang-tools/run-clang-tools.py | 74 ++++++++++
> > scripts/gen_compile_commands.py | 151 --------------------
> > 5 files changed, 233 insertions(+), 155 deletions(-)
> > create mode 100755 scripts/clang-tools/gen_compile_commands.py
> > create mode 100755 scripts/clang-tools/run-clang-tools.py
> > delete mode 100755 scripts/gen_compile_commands.py
> >
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >
--
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists