linux-kernel - [PATCH tip/core/rcu 11/12] rcu: Execute RCU reader shortly after rcu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200812225732.20068-11-paulmck@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 12 Aug 2020 15:57:31 -0700
From:   paulmck@...nel.org
To:     rcu@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com, mingo@...nel.org,
        jiangshanlai@...il.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
        josh@...htriplett.org, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
        rostedt@...dmis.org, dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com,
        fweisbec@...il.com, oleg@...hat.com, joel@...lfernandes.org,
        elver@...gle.com, dvyukov@...gle.com,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 11/12] rcu: Execute RCU reader shortly after rcu_core for strict GPs

From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>

A kernel built with CONFIG_RCU_STRICT_GRACE_PERIOD=y needs a quiescent
state to appear very shortly after a CPU has noticed a new grace period.
Placing an RCU reader immediately after this point is ineffective because
this normally happens in softirq context, which acts as a big RCU reader.
This commit therefore introduces a new per-CPU work_struct, which is
used at the end of rcu_core() processing to schedule an RCU read-side
critical section from within a clean environment.

Reported-by Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree.c | 13 +++++++++++++
 kernel/rcu/tree.h |  1 +
 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index dd7af40..ac37343 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -2634,6 +2634,14 @@ void rcu_force_quiescent_state(void)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_force_quiescent_state);
 
+// Workqueue handler for an RCU reader for kernels enforcing struct RCU
+// grace periods.
+static void strict_work_handler(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+}
+
 /* Perform RCU core processing work for the current CPU.  */
 static __latent_entropy void rcu_core(void)
 {
@@ -2678,6 +2686,10 @@ static __latent_entropy void rcu_core(void)
 	/* Do any needed deferred wakeups of rcuo kthreads. */
 	do_nocb_deferred_wakeup(rdp);
 	trace_rcu_utilization(TPS("End RCU core"));
+
+	// If strict GPs, schedule an RCU reader in a clean environment.
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_STRICT_GRACE_PERIOD))
+		queue_work_on(rdp->cpu, rcu_gp_wq, &rdp->strict_work);
 }
 
 static void rcu_core_si(struct softirq_action *h)
@@ -3874,6 +3886,7 @@ rcu_boot_init_percpu_data(int cpu)
 
 	/* Set up local state, ensuring consistent view of global state. */
 	rdp->grpmask = leaf_node_cpu_bit(rdp->mynode, cpu);
+	INIT_WORK(&rdp->strict_work, strict_work_handler);
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(rdp->dynticks_nesting != 1);
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(rcu_dynticks_in_eqs(rcu_dynticks_snap(rdp)));
 	rdp->rcu_ofl_gp_seq = rcu_state.gp_seq;
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.h b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
index 309bc7f..e4f66b8 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
@@ -165,6 +165,7 @@ struct rcu_data {
 					/* period it is aware of. */
 	struct irq_work defer_qs_iw;	/* Obtain later scheduler attention. */
 	bool defer_qs_iw_pending;	/* Scheduler attention pending? */
+	struct work_struct strict_work;	/* Schedule readers for strict GPs. */
 
 	/* 2) batch handling */
 	struct rcu_segcblist cblist;	/* Segmented callback list, with */
-- 
2.9.5