linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] riscv: Setup exception vector for nommu platform

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CY4PR04MB375169F5D9CE1EB09B592CB5E7430@CY4PR04MB3751.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Thu, 13 Aug 2020 07:03:32 +0000
From:   Damien Le Moal <Damien.LeMoal@....com>
To:     Atish Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org>
CC:     Qiu Wenbo <qiuwenbo@...tium.com.cn>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        "linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
        Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
        Anup Patel <Anup.Patel@....com>,
        Atish Patra <Atish.Patra@....com>,
        Greentime Hu <greentime.hu@...ive.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] riscv: Setup exception vector for nommu platform

On 2020/08/13 15:45, Atish Patra wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 10:44 PM Damien Le Moal <Damien.LeMoal@....com> wrote:
>>
>> On 2020/08/13 12:40, Qiu Wenbo wrote:
>>> Exception vector is missing on nommu platform and that is an issue.
>>> This patch is tested in Sipeed Maix Bit Dev Board.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 79b1feba5455 ("RISC-V: Setup exception vector early")
>>> Suggested-by: Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>
>>> Suggested-by: Atish Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Qiu Wenbo <qiuwenbo@...tium.com.cn>
>>
>> Please add a cc stable #5.8 tag. Kendryte support is in 5.8 stable.
>>
> 
> That won't be necessary as the patch that broke nommu (79b1feba5455) was
> part of the 1st PR sent towards 5.9-rc1.

Oops. Yes indeed. Thanks !



-- 
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research