[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0a1d9db5-dc5f-5718-048d-861385ce2832@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2020 15:46:15 +0800
From: Jacob Wen <jian.w.wen@...cle.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: insert a general SMP memory barrier before
wake_up_bit()
On 8/13/20 3:31 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 10:44:38AM +0800, Jacob Wen wrote:
>> wake_up_bit() uses waitqueue_active() that needs the explicit smp_mb().
> Sounds like the barrier should go into wake_up_bit then..
wake_up_bit() doesn't know which one to chose: smp_mb__after_atomic() or
smp_mb().
>
>> Signed-off-by: Jacob Wen <jian.w.wen@...cle.com>
>> ---
>> fs/block_dev.c | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/block_dev.c b/fs/block_dev.c
>> index 0ae656e022fd..e74980848a2a 100644
>> --- a/fs/block_dev.c
>> +++ b/fs/block_dev.c
>> @@ -1175,6 +1175,7 @@ static void bd_clear_claiming(struct block_device *whole, void *holder)
>> /* tell others that we're done */
>> BUG_ON(whole->bd_claiming != holder);
>> whole->bd_claiming = NULL;
>> + smp_mb();
>> wake_up_bit(&whole->bd_claiming, 0);
>> }
>>
>> --
>> 2.17.1
>>
> ---end quoted text---
Powered by blists - more mailing lists