[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <310ebf1c-02d6-b31f-e92e-619d46fa94aa@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2020 10:58:53 +0200
From: Auger Eric <eric.auger@...hat.com>
To: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
Cc: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
Raj Ashok <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 5/7] iommu/uapi: Rename uapi functions
Hi Jacob,
On 7/30/20 2:21 AM, Jacob Pan wrote:
> User APIs such as iommu_sva_unbind_gpasid() may also be used by the
> kernel. Since we introduced user pointer to the UAPI functions,
Practically this is done in the next patch. What about something like:
We plan to have two flavors of the same API functions, one called
through ioctls, carrying a user pointer and one called directly with
valid IOMMU UAPI structs. To differentiate both, let's rename existing
functions with an iommu_uapi_ prefix.
Besides
Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>
Thanks
Eric
> in-kernel callers cannot share the same APIs. In-kernel callers are also
> trusted, there is no need to validate the data.
>
> This patch renames all UAPI functions with iommu_uapi_ prefix such that
> is clear to the intended callers.
>
> Suggested-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 18 +++++++++---------
> include/linux/iommu.h | 31 ++++++++++++++++---------------
> 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> index b6858adc4f17..3a913ce94a3d 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> @@ -1950,35 +1950,35 @@ int iommu_attach_device(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_attach_device);
>
> -int iommu_cache_invalidate(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev,
> - struct iommu_cache_invalidate_info *inv_info)
> +int iommu_uapi_cache_invalidate(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev,
> + struct iommu_cache_invalidate_info *inv_info)
> {
> if (unlikely(!domain->ops->cache_invalidate))
> return -ENODEV;
>
> return domain->ops->cache_invalidate(domain, dev, inv_info);
> }
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_cache_invalidate);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_uapi_cache_invalidate);
>
> -int iommu_sva_bind_gpasid(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> - struct device *dev, struct iommu_gpasid_bind_data *data)
> +int iommu_uapi_sva_bind_gpasid(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> + struct device *dev, struct iommu_gpasid_bind_data *data)
> {
> if (unlikely(!domain->ops->sva_bind_gpasid))
> return -ENODEV;
>
> return domain->ops->sva_bind_gpasid(domain, dev, data);
> }
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_sva_bind_gpasid);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_uapi_sva_bind_gpasid);
>
> -int iommu_sva_unbind_gpasid(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev,
> - ioasid_t pasid)
> +int iommu_uapi_sva_unbind_gpasid(struct iommu_domain *domain, struct device *dev,
> + ioasid_t pasid)
> {
> if (unlikely(!domain->ops->sva_unbind_gpasid))
> return -ENODEV;
>
> return domain->ops->sva_unbind_gpasid(dev, pasid);
> }
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_sva_unbind_gpasid);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iommu_uapi_sva_unbind_gpasid);
>
> static void __iommu_detach_device(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> struct device *dev)
> diff --git a/include/linux/iommu.h b/include/linux/iommu.h
> index 5f0b7859d2eb..2dcc1a33f6dc 100644
> --- a/include/linux/iommu.h
> +++ b/include/linux/iommu.h
> @@ -430,13 +430,13 @@ extern int iommu_attach_device(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> struct device *dev);
> extern void iommu_detach_device(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> struct device *dev);
> -extern int iommu_cache_invalidate(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> - struct device *dev,
> - struct iommu_cache_invalidate_info *inv_info);
> -extern int iommu_sva_bind_gpasid(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> - struct device *dev, struct iommu_gpasid_bind_data *data);
> -extern int iommu_sva_unbind_gpasid(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> - struct device *dev, ioasid_t pasid);
> +extern int iommu_uapi_cache_invalidate(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> + struct device *dev,
> + struct iommu_cache_invalidate_info *inv_info);
> +extern int iommu_uapi_sva_bind_gpasid(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> + struct device *dev, struct iommu_gpasid_bind_data *data);
> +extern int iommu_uapi_sva_unbind_gpasid(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> + struct device *dev, ioasid_t pasid);
> extern struct iommu_domain *iommu_get_domain_for_dev(struct device *dev);
> extern struct iommu_domain *iommu_get_dma_domain(struct device *dev);
> extern int iommu_map(struct iommu_domain *domain, unsigned long iova,
> @@ -1054,21 +1054,22 @@ static inline int iommu_sva_get_pasid(struct iommu_sva *handle)
> return IOMMU_PASID_INVALID;
> }
>
> -static inline int
> -iommu_cache_invalidate(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> - struct device *dev,
> - struct iommu_cache_invalidate_info *inv_info)
> +static inline int iommu_uapi_cache_invalidate(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> + struct device *dev,
> + struct iommu_cache_invalidate_info *inv_info)
> {
> return -ENODEV;
> }
> -static inline int iommu_sva_bind_gpasid(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> - struct device *dev, struct iommu_gpasid_bind_data *data)
> +
> +static inline int iommu_uapi_sva_bind_gpasid(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> + struct device *dev,
> + struct iommu_gpasid_bind_data *data)
> {
> return -ENODEV;
> }
>
> -static inline int iommu_sva_unbind_gpasid(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> - struct device *dev, int pasid)
> +static inline int iommu_uapi_sva_unbind_gpasid(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> + struct device *dev, int pasid)
> {
> return -ENODEV;
> }
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists