[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200813101703.566thqmnc2d7cb3n@holly.lan>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2020 11:17:03 +0100
From: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>
To: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>
Cc: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, kgdb-bugreport@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/5] Introduce NMI aware serial drivers
On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 02:55:12PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Aug 2020 at 05:38, Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 8:27 AM Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org> wrote:
> > > One
> > > last worry is that I assume that most people testing (and even
> > > automated testing labs) will either always enable NMI or won't enable
> > > NMI. That means that everyone will be only testing one codepath or
> > > the other and (given the complexity) the non-tested codepath will
> > > break.
> > >
>
> The current patch-set only makes this NMI to work when debugger (kgdb)
> is enabled which I think is mostly suitable for development
> environments. So most people testing will involve existing IRQ mode
> only.
>
> However, it's very much possible to make NMI mode as default for a
> particular serial driver if the underlying irqchip supports it but it
> depends if we really see any production level usage of NMI debug
> feature.
The effect of this patch is not to make kgdb work from NMI it is to make
(some) SysRqs work from NMI. I think that only allowing it to deploy for
kgdb users is a mistake.
Having it deploy automatically for kgdb users might be OK but it seems
sensible to make this feature available for other users too.
Daniel.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists