[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87k0y2lu4k.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2020 12:26:03 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc: Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@...il.com>,
Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>,
Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>, Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, zhang.lyra@...il.com,
ruifeng.zhang1@...soc.com, cixi.geng1@...soc.com,
Orson Zhai <orson.zhai@...soc.com>,
Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>,
Steven Sistare <steven.sistare@...cle.com>,
Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>,
Jon DeVree <nuxi@...lt24.org>,
Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@...ian.org>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] printk: Change timestamp to triplet as mono, boot and real
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com> writes:
> On (20/08/11 15:02), Petr Mladek wrote:
>> There is still the alternative to print all three timestamps regularly
>> for those interested. It is less user convenient but much easier
>> to maintain.
>
> Yes, that's a nice alternative.
It's trivial on the kernel side, annoying for all people who do not care
about them because they show up in syslog and it's a fricking nightmare
to reconstruct over a large cluster of machines.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists