linux-kernel - [PATCH][V2] of/address: check for invalid range.cpu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200813114344.67730-1-colin.king@canonical.com>
Date:   Thu, 13 Aug 2020 12:43:44 +0100
From:   Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
To:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH][V2] of/address: check for invalid range.cpu_addr

From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>

Currently invalid CPU addresses are not being sanity checked resulting in
SATA setup failure on a SynQuacer SC2A11 development machine. The original
check was removed by and earlier commit, so add a sanity check back in
to avoid this regression.

Fixes: 7a8b64d17e35 ("of/address: use range parser for of_dma_get_range")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
---
 drivers/of/address.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/of/address.c b/drivers/of/address.c
index 590493e04b01..6ffbf7b99e92 100644
--- a/drivers/of/address.c
+++ b/drivers/of/address.c
@@ -985,6 +985,10 @@ int of_dma_get_range(struct device_node *np, u64 *dma_addr, u64 *paddr, u64 *siz
 			/* Don't error out as we'd break some existing DTs */
 			continue;
 		}
+		if (range.cpu_addr == OF_BAD_ADDR) {
+			pr_err("Translation of CPU address failed on node (%pOF)\n", node);
+			continue;
+		}
 		dma_offset = range.cpu_addr - range.bus_addr;
 
 		/* Take lower and upper limits */
-- 

V2: print message using pr_err and don't print range.cpu_addr as it's always
    going to be OF_BAD_ADDR so the information is pointless.
--
2.27.0