linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 1/4] scsi: ufs: Add UFS feature related parameter

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1431530910.81597285503798.JavaMail.epsvc@epcpadp1>
Date:   Thu, 13 Aug 2020 11:16:25 +0900
From:   Daejun Park <daejun7.park@...sung.com>
To:     Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
        Daejun Park <daejun7.park@...sung.com>,
        "avri.altman@....com" <avri.altman@....com>,
        "jejb@...ux.ibm.com" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        "asutoshd@...eaurora.org" <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>,
        "beanhuo@...ron.com" <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
        "stanley.chu@...iatek.com" <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>,
        "cang@...eaurora.org" <cang@...eaurora.org>,
        "tomas.winkler@...el.com" <tomas.winkler@...el.com>,
        ALIM AKHTAR <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>
CC:     "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Sang-yoon Oh <sangyoon.oh@...sung.com>,
        Sung-Jun Park <sungjun07.park@...sung.com>,
        yongmyung lee <ymhungry.lee@...sung.com>,
        Jinyoung CHOI <j-young.choi@...sung.com>,
        Adel Choi <adel.choi@...sung.com>,
        BoRam Shin <boram.shin@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/4] scsi: ufs: Add UFS feature related parameter

Hi Bart,

> On 2020-08-06 02:02, Daejun Park wrote:
> > @@ -537,6 +548,7 @@ struct ufs_dev_info {
> >      u8 *model;
> >      u16 wspecversion;
> >      u32 clk_gating_wait_us;
> > +    u8 b_ufs_feature_sup;
> >      u32 d_ext_ufs_feature_sup;
> >      u8 b_wb_buffer_type;
> >      u32 d_wb_alloc_units;
> > 
> 
> Hmm ... shouldn't this variable be introduced in the patch that introduces
> the code that sets and uses this variable?

OK, I will move this variable to 2/4 patch.

> How about making it clear in the patch subject that this patch adds protocol
> constants related to HPB?

The subject will be changed :
"Add UFS feature related parameter -> Adds constants related to HPB"
 
> Otherwise this patch looks good to me.
> 
> Bart.

Thanks,

Daejun