linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 3/4] scsi: ufs: L2P map management for HPB read

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <336371513.41597288683542.JavaMail.epsvc@epcpadp2>
Date:   Thu, 13 Aug 2020 12:13:43 +0900
From:   Daejun Park <daejun7.park@...sung.com>
To:     Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
        Daejun Park <daejun7.park@...sung.com>,
        "avri.altman@....com" <avri.altman@....com>,
        "jejb@...ux.ibm.com" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        "asutoshd@...eaurora.org" <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>,
        "beanhuo@...ron.com" <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
        "stanley.chu@...iatek.com" <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>,
        "cang@...eaurora.org" <cang@...eaurora.org>,
        "tomas.winkler@...el.com" <tomas.winkler@...el.com>,
        ALIM AKHTAR <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>
CC:     "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Sang-yoon Oh <sangyoon.oh@...sung.com>,
        Sung-Jun Park <sungjun07.park@...sung.com>,
        yongmyung lee <ymhungry.lee@...sung.com>,
        Jinyoung CHOI <j-young.choi@...sung.com>,
        Adel Choi <adel.choi@...sung.com>,
        BoRam Shin <boram.shin@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 3/4] scsi: ufs: L2P map management for HPB read

On 2020-08-06 02:15, Daejun Park wrote:
> > +    req->end_io_data = (void *)map_req;
> 
> Please leave the (void *) cast out since explicit casts from a non-void
> to a void pointer are not necessary in C.

OK, I will fix it.
 
> > +static inline struct
> > +ufshpb_rsp_field *ufshpb_get_hpb_rsp(struct ufshcd_lrb *lrbp)
> > +{
> > +    return (struct ufshpb_rsp_field *)&lrbp->ucd_rsp_ptr->sr.sense_data_len;
> > +}
> 
> Please introduce a union in struct utp_cmd_rsp instead of using casts
> to reinterpret a part of a data structure.

OK. I will introduce a union in struct utp_cmd_rsp and use it.

> > +/* routine : isr (ufs) */
> 
> The above comment looks very cryptic. Should it perhaps be expanded?
> 
> > +struct ufshpb_active_field {
> > +    __be16 active_rgn;
> > +    __be16 active_srgn;
> > +} __packed;
> 
> Since "__packed" is not necessary for the above data structure, please
> remove it. Note: a typical approach in the Linux kernel to verify that
> the compiler has not inserted any padding bytes is to add a BUILD_BUG_ON()
> statement in an initialization function that verifies the size of ABI data
> structures. See also the output of the following command:
> 
> git grep -nH 'BUILD_BUG_ON.sizeof.*!='

OK, I didn't know about it. Thanks.

> > +struct ufshpb_rsp_field {
> > +    __be16 sense_data_len;
> > +    u8 desc_type;
> > +    u8 additional_len;
> > +    u8 hpb_type;
> > +    u8 reserved;
> > +    u8 active_rgn_cnt;
> > +    u8 inactive_rgn_cnt;
> > +    struct ufshpb_active_field hpb_active_field[2];
> > +    __be16 hpb_inactive_field[2];
> > +} __packed;
> 
> I think the above __packed statement should also be left out.

OK, I will remove it.

Thanks,
Daejun