[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200814055119.GA17263@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2020 13:51:19 +0800
From: Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>
To: Youling Tang <tangyouling@...ngson.cn>
Cc: Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kexec: Delete an unnecessary comparison
On 08/13/20 at 08:45pm, Youling Tang wrote:
> Regardless of whether the ret value is zero or non-zero, the trajectory
> of the program execution is the same, so there is no need to compare.
>
> Signed-off-by: Youling Tang <tangyouling@...ngson.cn>
> ---
> kernel/kexec_file.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/kexec_file.c b/kernel/kexec_file.c
> index 78c0837..3ad0ae2 100644
> --- a/kernel/kexec_file.c
> +++ b/kernel/kexec_file.c
> @@ -800,8 +800,6 @@ static int kexec_calculate_store_digests(struct kimage *image)
>
> ret = kexec_purgatory_get_set_symbol(image, "purgatory_sha256_digest",
> digest, SHA256_DIGEST_SIZE, 0);
> - if (ret)
> - goto out_free_digest;
> }
>
> out_free_digest:
> --
> 2.1.0
>
Acked-by: Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>
Thanks
Dave
Powered by blists - more mailing lists