[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200814083021.8962-1-bernard@vivo.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2020 01:30:19 -0700
From: Bernard Zhao <bernard@...o.com>
To: David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Bernard Zhao <bernard@...o.com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: opensource.kernel@...o.com
Subject: [PATCH] drm/via: reduce no need mutex_lock area
In function via_mem_alloc`s error branch, DRM_ERROR is protected
in the mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex) area.
>From the code, we see that DRM_ERROR is just an error log print
without any struct element, there is no need to protect this.
Signed-off-by: Bernard Zhao <bernard@...o.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/via/via_mm.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/via/via_mm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/via/via_mm.c
index 45cc9e900260..dae1bacd86c1 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/via/via_mm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/via/via_mm.c
@@ -129,9 +129,9 @@ int via_mem_alloc(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
if (0 == ((mem->type == VIA_MEM_VIDEO) ? dev_priv->vram_initialized :
dev_priv->agp_initialized)) {
+ mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
DRM_ERROR
("Attempt to allocate from uninitialized memory manager.\n");
- mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
return -EINVAL;
}
--
2.26.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists