lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 14 Aug 2020 09:52:38 +0000
From:   David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To:     'Luis Henriques' <lhenriques@...e.de>,
        Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
        Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>
CC:     "ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org" <ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] ceph: remove unnecessary return in switch statement

From: Luis Henriques
> Sent: 14 August 2020 10:38
> 
> Since there's a return immediately after the 'break', there's no need for
> this extra 'return' in the S_IFDIR case.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <lhenriques@...e.de>
> ---
>  fs/ceph/file.c | 2 --
>  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ceph/file.c b/fs/ceph/file.c
> index d51c3f2fdca0..04ab99c0223a 100644
> --- a/fs/ceph/file.c
> +++ b/fs/ceph/file.c
> @@ -256,8 +256,6 @@ static int ceph_init_file(struct inode *inode, struct file *file, int fmode)
>  	case S_IFDIR:
>  		ret = ceph_init_file_info(inode, file, fmode,
>  						S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode));
> -		if (ret)
> -			return ret;
>  		break;
> 
>  	case S_IFLNK:

I'd move the other way and just do:
		return ceph_init_file_info(...);

	David

-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ