[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200814124724.GK975@Air-de-Roger>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2020 14:47:25 +0200
From: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@...rix.com>
To: Jürgen Groß <jgross@...e.com>
CC: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Oleksandr Andrushchenko <oleksandr_andrushchenko@...m.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>, Wei Liu <wl@....org>,
"Yan Yankovskyi" <yyankovskyi@...il.com>,
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
<xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] xen: add helpers to allocate unpopulated memory
On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 12:27:32PM +0200, Jürgen Groß wrote:
> On 14.08.20 11:56, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 08:29:20AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 09:54:20AM +0200, Roger Pau Monn?? wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 08:33:37AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 11:44:47AM +0200, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> > > > > > If enabled (because ZONE_DEVICE is supported) the usage of the new
> > > > > > functionality untangles Xen balloon and RAM hotplug from the usage of
> > > > > > unpopulated physical memory ranges to map foreign pages, which is the
> > > > > > correct thing to do in order to avoid mappings of foreign pages depend
> > > > > > on memory hotplug.
> > > > >
> > > > > So please just select ZONE_DEVICE if this is so much better rather
> > > > > than maintaining two variants.
> > > >
> > > > We still need to other variant for Arm at least, so both need to be
> > > > maintained anyway, even if we force ZONE_DEVICE on x86.
> > >
> > > Well, it still really helps reproducability if you stick to one
> > > implementation of x86.
> > >
> > > The alternative would be an explicit config option to opt into it,
> > > but just getting a different implementation based on a random
> > > kernel option is strange.
> >
> > Would adding something like the chunk below to the patch be OK?
> >
> > ---8<---
> > diff --git a/drivers/xen/Kconfig b/drivers/xen/Kconfig
> > index 018020b91baa..5f321a1319e6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/xen/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/xen/Kconfig
> > @@ -328,7 +328,14 @@ config XEN_FRONT_PGDIR_SHBUF
> > tristate
> > config XEN_UNPOPULATED_ALLOC
> > - bool
> > - default y if ZONE_DEVICE && !ARM && !ARM64
> > + bool "Use unpopulated memory ranges for guest mappings"
> > + depends on X86
> > + select ZONE_DEVICE
> > + default y
>
> I'd rather use "default XEN_BACKEND" here, as mappings of other guest's
> memory is rarely used for non-backend guests.
There's also the privcmd and gnt devices which make heavy use of this,
so I'm not sure only selecting by default on XEN_BACKEND is the best
option.
Thanks, Roger.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists