linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] scripts: coccicheck: Change default value for parallelism

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200814132948.GA62819@kroah.com>
Date:   Fri, 14 Aug 2020 15:29:48 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
Cc:     Sumera Priyadarsini <sylphrenadin@...il.com>,
        Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>,
        Coccinelle <cocci@...teme.lip6.fr>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
        Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@...6.fr>,
        Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
        Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
        Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@...g.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] scripts: coccicheck: Change default value for
 parallelism

On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 03:06:06PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > a decrease in performance is noted. The elapsed time is  minimum
> 
> Can the following wording variant be more appropriate?
> 
>   a decrease was noticed in the software performance. The elapsed time is minimal
> 
> 
> > respectively for two separate runs. …
> 
> Can such information trigger further considerations for benchmarking approaches?
> 
> Regards,
> Markus

Hi,

This is the semi-friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.

Markus, you seem to have sent a nonsensical or otherwise pointless
review comment to a patch submission on a Linux kernel developer mailing
list.  I strongly suggest that you not do this anymore.  Please do not
bother developers who are actively working to produce patches and
features with comments that, in the end, are a waste of time.

Patch submitter, please ignore Markus's suggestion; you do not need to
follow it at all.  The person/bot/AI that sent it is being ignored by
almost all Linux kernel maintainers for having a persistent pattern of
behavior of producing distracting and pointless commentary, and
inability to adapt to feedback.  Please feel free to also ignore emails
from them.

thanks,

greg k-h's patch email bot