[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=whLhwum2E+qperD=TypGHXxoBtXOu-HHDd9L9_XFFyiaA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2020 10:05:09 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Jeffrey E Altman <jaltman@...istor.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Karel Zak <kzak@...hat.com>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>,
Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>,
Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>,
Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>,
Lennart Poettering <lennart@...ttering.net>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net>,
LSM <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: file metadata via fs API (was: [GIT PULL] Filesystem Information)
On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 8:53 PM Jeffrey E Altman <jaltman@...istor.com> wrote:
>
> For the AFS community, fsinfo offers a method of exposing some server
> and volume properties that are obtained via "path ioctls" in OpenAFS and
> AuriStorFS. Some example of properties that might be exposed include
> answers to questions such as:
Note that several of the questions you ask aren't necessarily
mount-related at all.
Doing it by mount ends up being completely the wrong thing.
For example, at a minimum, these guys may well be per-directory (or
even possibly per-file):
> * where is a mounted volume hosted? which fileservers, named by uuid
> * what is the block size? 1K, 4K, ...
> * are directories just-send-8, case-sensitive, case-preserving, or
> case-insensitive?
> * if not just-send-8, what character set is used?
> * if Unicode, what normalization rules? etc.
> * what volume security policy (authn, integ, priv) is assigned, if any?
> * what is the replication policy, if any?
> * what is the volume encryption policy, if any?
and trying to solve this with some kind of "mount info" is pure garbage.
Honestly, I really think you may want an extended [f]statfs(), not
some mount tracking.
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists