lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 14 Aug 2020 19:22:13 +0200
From:   peter enderborg <peter.enderborg@...y.com>
To:     Stephen Smalley <stephen.smalley.work@...il.com>
CC:     ThiƩbaud Weksteen <tweek@...gle.com>,
        Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>,
        Nick Kralevich <nnk@...gle.com>,
        Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>,
        Eric Paris <eparis@...isplace.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        SElinux list <selinux@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] selinux: add tracepoint on denials

On 8/14/20 7:08 PM, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 1:07 PM peter enderborg
> <peter.enderborg@...y.com> wrote:
>> On 8/14/20 6:51 PM, Stephen Smalley wrote:
>>> On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 9:05 AM ThiƩbaud Weksteen <tweek@...gle.com> wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 5:41 PM Stephen Smalley
>>>> <stephen.smalley.work@...il.com> wrote:
>>>>> An explanation here of how one might go about decoding audited and
>>>>> tclass would be helpful to users (even better would be a script to do it
>>>>> for them).  Again, I know how to do that but not everyone using
>>>>> perf/ftrace will.
>>>> What about something along those lines:
>>>>
>>>> The tclass value can be mapped to a class by searching
>>>> security/selinux/flask.h. The audited value is a bit field of the
>>>> permissions described in security/selinux/av_permissions.h for the
>>>> corresponding class.
>>> Sure, I guess that works.  Would be nice if we just included the class
>>> and permission name(s) in the event itself but I guess you viewed that
>>> as too heavyweight?
>> The class name is added in part 2. Im not sure how a proper format for permission
>> would look like in trace terms. It is a list, right?
> Yes.  See avc_audit_pre_callback() for example code to log the permission names.

I wrote about that on some of the previous sets. The problem is that trace format is quite fixed. So it is lists are not
that easy to handle if you want to filter in them. You can have a trace event for each of them. You can also add
additional trace event "selinux_audied_permission" for each permission. With that you can filter out tclass or permissions.

But the basic thing we would like at the moment is a event that we can debug in user space.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists