linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] i2c: iproc: fix race between client unreg and isr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 14 Aug 2020 15:41:21 -0700
From:   Ray Jui <ray.jui@...adcom.com>
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
        Dhananjay Phadke <dphadke@...ux.microsoft.com>,
        linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
        Rayagonda Kokatanur <rayagonda.kokatanur@...adcom.com>,
        bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] i2c: iproc: fix race between client unreg and isr



On 8/12/2020 1:06 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 05:42:40PM -0700, Dhananjay Phadke wrote:
>> When i2c client unregisters, synchronize irq before setting
>> iproc_i2c->slave to NULL.
>>
>> (1) disable_irq()
>> (2) Mask event enable bits in control reg
>> (3) Erase slave address (avoid further writes to rx fifo)
>> (4) Flush tx and rx FIFOs
>> (5) Clear pending event (interrupt) bits in status reg
>> (6) enable_irq()
>> (7) Set client pointer to NULL
>>
>> Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000318
>>
>> [  371.020421] pc : bcm_iproc_i2c_isr+0x530/0x11f0
>> [  371.025098] lr : __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x6c/0x170
>> [  371.030309] sp : ffff800010003e40
>> [  371.033727] x29: ffff800010003e40 x28: 0000000000000060
>> [  371.039206] x27: ffff800010ca9de0 x26: ffff800010f895df
>> [  371.044686] x25: ffff800010f18888 x24: ffff0008f7ff3600
>> [  371.050165] x23: 0000000000000003 x22: 0000000001600000
>> [  371.055645] x21: ffff800010f18888 x20: 0000000001600000
>> [  371.061124] x19: ffff0008f726f080 x18: 0000000000000000
>> [  371.066603] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000
>> [  371.072082] x15: 0000000000000000 x14: 0000000000000000
>> [  371.077561] x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000001
>> [  371.083040] x11: 0000000000000000 x10: 0000000000000040
>> [  371.088519] x9 : ffff800010f317c8 x8 : ffff800010f317c0
>> [  371.093999] x7 : ffff0008f805b3b0 x6 : 0000000000000000
>> [  371.099478] x5 : ffff0008f7ff36a4 x4 : ffff8008ee43d000
>> [  371.104957] x3 : 0000000000000000 x2 : ffff8000107d64c0
>> [  371.110436] x1 : 00000000c00000af x0 : 0000000000000000
>>
>> [  371.115916] Call trace:
>> [  371.118439]  bcm_iproc_i2c_isr+0x530/0x11f0
>> [  371.122754]  __handle_irq_event_percpu+0x6c/0x170
>> [  371.127606]  handle_irq_event_percpu+0x34/0x88
>> [  371.132189]  handle_irq_event+0x40/0x120
>> [  371.136234]  handle_fasteoi_irq+0xcc/0x1a0
>> [  371.140459]  generic_handle_irq+0x24/0x38
>> [  371.144594]  __handle_domain_irq+0x60/0xb8
>> [  371.148820]  gic_handle_irq+0xc0/0x158
>> [  371.152687]  el1_irq+0xb8/0x140
>> [  371.155927]  arch_cpu_idle+0x10/0x18
>> [  371.159615]  do_idle+0x204/0x290
>> [  371.162943]  cpu_startup_entry+0x24/0x60
>> [  371.166990]  rest_init+0xb0/0xbc
>> [  371.170322]  arch_call_rest_init+0xc/0x14
>> [  371.174458]  start_kernel+0x404/0x430
>>
>> Fixes: c245d94ed106 ("i2c: iproc: Add multi byte read-write support for slave mode")
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dhananjay Phadke <dphadke@...ux.microsoft.com>
> 
> Applied to for-next (i.e. 5.9), thanks!
> 
> BTW my code checkers found this (unrelated to this patch):
> 
> ===
>     CPPCHECK
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-bcm-iproc.c:723:14: warning: Shifting signed 32-bit value by 31 bits is undefined behaviour [shiftTooManyBitsSigned]
>     val |= 1 << M_TX_WR_STATUS_SHIFT;
>              ^
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-bcm-iproc.c:741:19: warning: Shifting signed 32-bit value by 31 bits is undefined behaviour [shiftTooManyBitsSigned]
>   val = addr | (1 << M_TX_WR_STATUS_SHIFT);
>                   ^
> ===
> 
> Use the BIT macro here.
> 

Thanks, Wolfram. I just sent out a separate patch to address that.