lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 15 Aug 2020 10:38:58 -0700
From:   Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
        Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
        syzbot <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        "Chang S . Bae" <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
        "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Markus T Metzger <markus.t.metzger@...el.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ravi Shankar <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/fsgsbase/64: Fix NULL deref in 86_fsgsbase_read_task

On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 4:48 AM Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
>
>
> * Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> > syzbot found its way in 86_fsgsbase_read_task() [1]
> >
> > Fix is to make sure ldt pointer is not NULL.
>
> Thanks for this fix. Linus has picked it up (inclusive the typos to
> the x86_fsgsbase_read_task() function name ;-), it's now upstream
> under:
>
>   8ab49526b53d: ("x86/fsgsbase/64: Fix NULL deref in 86_fsgsbase_read_task")
>
> By the fixes tag it looks like this should probably be backported all
> the way back to ~v4.20 or so?

This is absolutely right, sorry about the lack of a stable tag.

Most of my patches usually land into David Miller trees, where the
stable tag is not welcomed.
We use  Fixes: tags to convey the exact information needed for stable backports.

Thanks.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ