[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200815082754.GM3982@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2020 10:27:54 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: paulmck@...nel.org, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, RCU <rcu@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
"Theodore Y . Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Oleksiy Avramchenko <oleksiy.avramchenko@...ymobile.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC-PATCH 1/2] mm: Add __GFP_NO_LOCKS flag
On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 01:14:53AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> As a matter of fact I assume^Wdeclare that removing struct rcu_head which
> provides a fallback is not an option at all. I know that you want to,
> but it wont work ever. Dream on, but as we agreed on recently there is
> this thing called reality which ruins everything.
It never was going to work, freeing memory can never hard rely on the
success of allocating memory.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists