lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 14 Aug 2020 17:26:55 -0700
From:   Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
To:     Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Peter Collingbourne <pcc@...gle.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@...nel.org>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@...cle.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: work around clang IAS bug referencing __force_order

On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 3:57 PM Nick Desaulniers
<ndesaulniers@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 2:19 PM Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 7:29 PM Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks for the proposal.
> > >
> > > I have adapted it to fit my patchset against Linux v5.8.
> > >
> > > Both Debian's GCC-10 and a snapshot version of LLVM toolchain
> > > v11.0.0-rc1+ seems to be OK.
> > >
> >
> > Yupp, OK.
> >
> > I was able to boot FreeDOS 1.2 VM in VirtualBox GUI.
>
> Hi Sedat,
> Apologies, but it's not clear to me precisely which patch you tested.
> Can you please confirm whether you tested:
> 1. Arnd's patch that started this thread.
> 2. My proposed diff adding -fno-addrsig to CFLAGS_powernow-k6.o.
> 3. My proposed diff removing __force_order from the kernel.
>
> I'm hoping you were referring to testing 3., but it's not clear to me.

Ah, sorry, I missed your comment on github:
https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1120#issuecomment-674282107

Ok, I will look at more disassembly next week and hopefully have a
patch ready, with your tested by tag.

-- 
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers

Powered by blists - more mailing lists