lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2020 20:14:57 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: linux-next: new build warnings after binutils update * Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 12:22:06PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > [0] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200731202738.2577854-6-nivedita@alum.mit.edu/ > > > > It all looked good to me but was a bit late for v5.9, will pick up > > after -rc1. > > Excellent! Thank you. I'll base the orphan series on x86/boot now. Once > I send a v6 (there are a few more things to tweak), can you carry that > in -tip as well (it includes arm and arm64 as well, all of which depend > on several asm-generic patches). Sure, that looks the most sensible, since there's so much x86 impact. Might migrate the commits over into a more generic topic branch - started out with x86/boot to get things going. Thanks, Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists