linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 2/2] EDAC: al-mc-edac: Introduce Amazon's Annapurna Labs Memory Controller EDAC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <241ac8f0-964b-10d1-2d7b-eb9f435748a6@amazon.com>
Date:   Sun, 16 Aug 2020 14:35:37 +0300
From:   "Shenhar, Talel" <talel@...zon.com>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
CC:     <mchehab@...nel.org>, <james.morse@....com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
        <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
        <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
        <catalin.marinas@....com>, <will@...nel.org>,
        <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <hhhawa@...zon.com>,
        <ronenk@...zon.com>, <jonnyc@...zon.com>, <hanochu@...zon.com>,
        <eitan@...zon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 2/2] EDAC: al-mc-edac: Introduce Amazon's Annapurna Labs
 Memory Controller EDAC


On 8/16/2020 2:22 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the content is safe.
>
>
>
> On Sun, Aug 16, 2020 at 12:17:31PM +0300, Shenhar, Talel wrote:
>> Let me know what you think.
> Well, devm_al_mc_edac_free() devm_al_mc_edac_del() look like useless
> wrappers to me and can be removed and you can use edac_mc_del_mc() and
> edac_mc_free() directly. But then you need to cast them in an ugly way
> so that it builds:
>
>          ret = devm_add_action(&pdev->dev, (void (*)(void *data))edac_mc_free, mci);
>
> I guess we can leave them as is and then lift them into the EDAC core if
> someone else wants to do the same devm_* thing.
>
> al_mc_edac_get_scrub_mode() doesn't need a prefix because it is used
> only once and the compiler is simply inlining it so you can forget the
> stack trace visibility:
>
> $ readelf -s drivers/edac/al_mc_edac.ko | grep scrub
> $
>
> The others are fine, I guess, since they're function pointers and cannot be
> inlined as such so you want them prefixed:
>
> $ readelf -s drivers/edac/al_mc_edac.ko | grep al_mc_edac
>      23: 00000000     0 FILE    LOCAL  DEFAULT  ABS al_mc_edac.c
>      25: 00000000     4 FUNC    LOCAL  DEFAULT    1 devm_al_mc_edac_free
>      27: 00000004     4 FUNC    LOCAL  DEFAULT    1 devm_al_mc_edac_del
>      31: 00000124    24 FUNC    LOCAL  DEFAULT    1 al_mc_edac_irq_handler_ce
>      35: 00000260    24 FUNC    LOCAL  DEFAULT    1 al_mc_edac_irq_handler_ue
>      36: 00000278    56 FUNC    LOCAL  DEFAULT    1 al_mc_edac_check
>      37: 000002b0   680 FUNC    LOCAL  DEFAULT    1 al_mc_edac_probe
>      47: 00000000    20 FUNC    LOCAL  DEFAULT    3 al_mc_edac_driver_init
>      51: 00000000    12 FUNC    LOCAL  DEFAULT    5 al_mc_edac_driver_exit
>      53: 00000000   392 OBJECT  LOCAL  DEFAULT   16 al_mc_edac_of_match
>      59: 00000000   104 OBJECT  LOCAL  DEFAULT   20 al_mc_edac_driver
>      61: 00000000     0 FILE    LOCAL  DEFAULT  ABS al_mc_edac.mod.c
>      88: 00000000   392 OBJECT  GLOBAL DEFAULT   16 __mod_of__al_mc_edac_of_m
>
> Thx.
Thanks. shall be part of v10.
>
> --
> Regards/Gruss,
>      Boris.
>
> https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette