[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87d03qjs99.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2020 21:38:26 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Felix.Kuehling@....com,
Qianli Zhao <zhaoqianligood@...il.com>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, axboe@...nel.dk
Cc: john.stultz@...aro.org, ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk,
bfields@...hat.com, cl@...k-chips.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, zhaoqianli@...omi.com
Subject: Re: [RFC V2] kthread: add object debug support
On Sat, Aug 15 2020 at 01:37, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Thomas Gleixner (2020-08-12 03:27:03)
>> or any other variant of insanity which makes the check claim that this
>> is statically initialized then you rightfully can keep the pieces :)
>
> Makes sense. Maybe this "technique" should be documented in
> Documentation/core-api/debug-objects.rst? I can cook up a patch to add
> is_static_object() to the Fixup functions section.
Sure. Better documentation is always a good thing.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists