[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1597542893.7483.3.camel@mtkswgap22>
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2020 09:54:53 +0800
From: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>
To: Bean Huo <huobean@...il.com>
CC: <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>, <avri.altman@....com>,
<asutoshd@...eaurora.org>, <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
<martin.petersen@...cle.com>, <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
<bvanassche@....org>, <tomas.winkler@...el.com>,
<cang@...eaurora.org>, <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] scsi: ufs: no need to send one Abort Task TM in
case the task in DB was cleared
On Tue, 2020-08-11 at 16:18 +0200, Bean Huo wrote:
> From: Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>
>
> If the bit corresponds to a task in the Doorbell register has been
> cleared, no need to poll the status of the task on the device side
> and to send an Abort Task TM. Instead, let it directly goto cleanup.
>
> Meanwhile, to keep original debug print, move this goto below the debug
> print.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>
Reviewed-by: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists