[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABCJKucsXufD6rmv7qQZ=9kLC7XrngCJkKA_WzGOAn-KfcObeA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 10:14:43 -0700
From: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>
To: Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu>
Cc: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>,
Fangrui Song <maskray@...gle.com>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dávid Bolvanský <david.bolvansky@...il.com>,
Eli Friedman <efriedma@...cinc.com>,
"# 3.4.x" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
"Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Daniel Axtens <dja@...ens.net>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>,
Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@...log.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] lib/string.c: implement stpcpy
On Sun, Aug 16, 2020 at 8:02 AM Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Aug 16, 2020 at 07:22:35AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 16, 2020 at 2:19 AM 'Fangrui Song' via Clang Built Linux
> > <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Adding a definition without a declaration for stpcpy looks good.
> > > Clang LTO will work.
> > >
> > > (If the kernel does not want to provide these routines,
> > > is http://git.kernel.org/linus/6edfba1b33c701108717f4e036320fc39abe1912
> > > probably wrong? (why remove -ffreestanding from the main Makefile) )
> > >
> >
> > We had some many issues in arch/x86 where *FLAGS were removed or used
> > differently and had to re-add them :-(.
> >
> > So if -ffreestanding is used in arch/x86 and was! used in top-level
> > Makefile - it makes sense to re-add it back?
> > ( I cannot speak for archs other than x86. )
> >
> > - Sedat -
>
> -ffreestanding disables _all_ builtins and libcall optimizations, which
> is probably not desirable. If we added it back, we'd need to also go
> back to #define various string functions to the __builtin versions.
>
> Though I don't understand the original issue, with -ffreestanding,
> sprintf shouldn't have been turned into strcpy in the first place.
>
> 32-bit still has -ffreestanding -- I wonder if that's actually necessary
> any more?
>
> Why does -fno-builtin-stpcpy not work with clang LTO? Isn't that a
> compiler bug?
I just confirmed that adding -fno-builtin-stpcpy to KBUILD_CFLAGS does
work with LTO as well.
Sami
Powered by blists - more mailing lists