| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 06:30:55 +0000
From: "Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@...el.com>
To: Auger Eric <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
"alex.williamson@...hat.com" <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
"baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com" <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
"joro@...tes.org" <joro@...tes.org>
CC: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
"jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com" <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>,
"Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
"Tian, Jun J" <jun.j.tian@...el.com>,
"Sun, Yi Y" <yi.y.sun@...el.com>,
"jean-philippe@...aro.org" <jean-philippe@...aro.org>,
"peterx@...hat.com" <peterx@...hat.com>,
"Wu, Hao" <hao.wu@...el.com>,
"stefanha@...il.com" <stefanha@...il.com>,
"iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v6 11/15] vfio/type1: Allow invalidating first-level/stage
IOMMU cache
Hi Eric,
> From: Auger Eric <eric.auger@...hat.com>
> Sent: Sunday, August 16, 2020 7:35 PM
>
> Hi Yi,
>
> On 7/28/20 8:27 AM, Liu Yi L wrote:
> > This patch provides an interface allowing the userspace to invalidate
> > IOMMU cache for first-level page table. It is required when the first
> > level IOMMU page table is not managed by the host kernel in the nested
> > translation setup.
> >
> > Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>
> > CC: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
> > Cc: Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>
> > Cc: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>
> > Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
> > Cc: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@...el.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > v1 -> v2:
> > *) rename from "vfio/type1: Flush stage-1 IOMMU cache for nesting type"
> > *) rename vfio_cache_inv_fn() to vfio_dev_cache_invalidate_fn()
> > *) vfio_dev_cache_inv_fn() always successful
> > *) remove VFIO_IOMMU_CACHE_INVALIDATE, and reuse
> VFIO_IOMMU_NESTING_OP
> > ---
> > drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 42
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > include/uapi/linux/vfio.h | 3 +++
> > 2 files changed, 45 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> > b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c index 245436e..bf95a0f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> > +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> > @@ -3056,6 +3056,45 @@ static long vfio_iommu_handle_pgtbl_op(struct
> vfio_iommu *iommu,
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > +static int vfio_dev_cache_invalidate_fn(struct device *dev, void
> > +*data) {
> > + struct domain_capsule *dc = (struct domain_capsule *)data;
> > + unsigned long arg = *(unsigned long *)dc->data;
> > +
> > + iommu_uapi_cache_invalidate(dc->domain, dev, (void __user *)arg);
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static long vfio_iommu_invalidate_cache(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
> > + unsigned long arg)
> > +{
> > + struct domain_capsule dc = { .data = &arg };
> > + struct iommu_nesting_info *info;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + mutex_lock(&iommu->lock);
> > + /*
> > + * Cache invalidation is required for any nesting IOMMU,
> So why do we expose the IOMMU_NESTING_FEAT_CACHE_INVLD capability? :-)
it's a stale comment. should be removed. :-)
> > + * so no need to check system-wide PASID support.
> > + */
> > + info = iommu->nesting_info;
> > + if (!info || !(info->features & IOMMU_NESTING_FEAT_CACHE_INVLD)) {
> > + ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > + goto out_unlock;
> > + }
> > +
> > + ret = vfio_get_nesting_domain_capsule(iommu, &dc);
> > + if (ret)
> > + goto out_unlock;
> > +
> > + iommu_group_for_each_dev(dc.group->iommu_group, &dc,
> > + vfio_dev_cache_invalidate_fn);
> > +
> > +out_unlock:
> > + mutex_unlock(&iommu->lock);
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > static long vfio_iommu_type1_nesting_op(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
> > unsigned long arg)
> > {
> > @@ -3078,6 +3117,9 @@ static long vfio_iommu_type1_nesting_op(struct
> vfio_iommu *iommu,
> > case VFIO_IOMMU_NESTING_OP_UNBIND_PGTBL:
> > ret = vfio_iommu_handle_pgtbl_op(iommu, false, arg + minsz);
> > break;
> > + case VFIO_IOMMU_NESTING_OP_CACHE_INVLD:
> > + ret = vfio_iommu_invalidate_cache(iommu, arg + minsz);
> > + break;
> > default:
> > ret = -EINVAL;
> > }
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> > index 9501cfb..48e2fb5 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> > @@ -1225,6 +1225,8 @@ struct vfio_iommu_type1_pasid_request {
> > * +-----------------+-----------------------------------------------+
> > * | UNBIND_PGTBL | struct iommu_gpasid_bind_data |
> > *
> > +-----------------+-----------------------------------------------+
> > + * | CACHE_INVLD | struct iommu_cache_invalidate_info |
> > + *
> > + +-----------------+-----------------------------------------------+
> > *
> > * returns: 0 on success, -errno on failure.
> > */
> > @@ -1237,6 +1239,7 @@ struct vfio_iommu_type1_nesting_op {
> >
> > #define VFIO_IOMMU_NESTING_OP_BIND_PGTBL (0)
> > #define VFIO_IOMMU_NESTING_OP_UNBIND_PGTBL (1)
> > +#define VFIO_IOMMU_NESTING_OP_CACHE_INVLD (2)
> According to my previous comment, you may refine VFIO_NESTING_OP_MASK too
yes, I've noticed it. also replied in patch 10/15.
Regards,
Yi Liu
> Thanks
>
> Eric
> >
> > #define VFIO_IOMMU_NESTING_OP _IO(VFIO_TYPE, VFIO_BASE + 19)
> >
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists