linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.4 243/270] spi: spidev: Align buffers for DMA

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200817143807.923171407@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 17 Aug 2020 17:17:24 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Christian Eggers <ceggers@...i.de>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.4 243/270] spi: spidev: Align buffers for DMA

From: Christian Eggers <ceggers@...i.de>

commit aa9e862d7d5bcecd4dca9f39e8b684b93dd84ee7 upstream.

Simply copying all xfers from userspace into one bounce buffer causes
alignment problems if the SPI controller uses DMA.

Ensure that all transfer data blocks within the rx and tx bounce buffers
are aligned for DMA (according to ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN).

Alignment may increase the usage of the bounce buffers. In some cases,
the buffers may need to be increased using the "bufsiz" module
parameter.

Signed-off-by: Christian Eggers <ceggers@...i.de>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200728100832.24788-1-ceggers@arri.de
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/spi/spidev.c |   21 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/spi/spidev.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spidev.c
@@ -223,6 +223,11 @@ static int spidev_message(struct spidev_
 	for (n = n_xfers, k_tmp = k_xfers, u_tmp = u_xfers;
 			n;
 			n--, k_tmp++, u_tmp++) {
+		/* Ensure that also following allocations from rx_buf/tx_buf will meet
+		 * DMA alignment requirements.
+		 */
+		unsigned int len_aligned = ALIGN(u_tmp->len, ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN);
+
 		k_tmp->len = u_tmp->len;
 
 		total += k_tmp->len;
@@ -238,17 +243,17 @@ static int spidev_message(struct spidev_
 
 		if (u_tmp->rx_buf) {
 			/* this transfer needs space in RX bounce buffer */
-			rx_total += k_tmp->len;
+			rx_total += len_aligned;
 			if (rx_total > bufsiz) {
 				status = -EMSGSIZE;
 				goto done;
 			}
 			k_tmp->rx_buf = rx_buf;
-			rx_buf += k_tmp->len;
+			rx_buf += len_aligned;
 		}
 		if (u_tmp->tx_buf) {
 			/* this transfer needs space in TX bounce buffer */
-			tx_total += k_tmp->len;
+			tx_total += len_aligned;
 			if (tx_total > bufsiz) {
 				status = -EMSGSIZE;
 				goto done;
@@ -258,7 +263,7 @@ static int spidev_message(struct spidev_
 						(uintptr_t) u_tmp->tx_buf,
 					u_tmp->len))
 				goto done;
-			tx_buf += k_tmp->len;
+			tx_buf += len_aligned;
 		}
 
 		k_tmp->cs_change = !!u_tmp->cs_change;
@@ -290,16 +295,16 @@ static int spidev_message(struct spidev_
 		goto done;
 
 	/* copy any rx data out of bounce buffer */
-	rx_buf = spidev->rx_buffer;
-	for (n = n_xfers, u_tmp = u_xfers; n; n--, u_tmp++) {
+	for (n = n_xfers, k_tmp = k_xfers, u_tmp = u_xfers;
+			n;
+			n--, k_tmp++, u_tmp++) {
 		if (u_tmp->rx_buf) {
 			if (copy_to_user((u8 __user *)
-					(uintptr_t) u_tmp->rx_buf, rx_buf,
+					(uintptr_t) u_tmp->rx_buf, k_tmp->rx_buf,
 					u_tmp->len)) {
 				status = -EFAULT;
 				goto done;
 			}
-			rx_buf += u_tmp->len;
 		}
 	}
 	status = total;